Compound or practice · Supplement

Sarcosine

An NMDA co-agonist amino acid with real add-on evidence in schizophrenia — a niche, mechanism-driven mood/cognition agent.

Overall grade
Grade C
Last revised
2
graded outcomes
0
references listed

A structured monograph in Prometheus's bundled library. Its grades are the monograph's own reading of the evidence, not a peer-reviewed review.

1 at grade B · 1 at grade C — 2 graded rows

What is known

Each outcome with its grade (how strong the evidence is, A to D), the size of the effect where the entry records one, and how often studies agree.

  • Schizophrenia (adjunct)Evidence grade B

    Add-on

    Smallmixed

  • OCD / depressionEvidence grade C

    Preliminary

    Smalllow

What is uncertain

Read off the same rows as above. Nothing here is added that the entry does not itself record.

  • Thin evidence: OCD / depression (grade C).
  • Studies disagree: Schizophrenia (adjunct) (mixed agreement).

The evidence in words

What it is

Sarcosine (N-methylglycine) is a glycine derivative that enhances NMDA-receptor signaling, studied mainly as a psychiatric adjunct.

How it works

It inhibits the glycine transporter (GlyT1), raising synaptic glycine and boosting NMDA-receptor function — the opposite of ketamine's NMDA blockade.

What the evidence shows

As an add-on to antipsychotics, sarcosine improved negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia in several small trials; there's preliminary OCD and depression signal. Evidence is niche and best framed as adjunctive, under psychiatric care.

Safety & interactions

Generally well tolerated; should not replace prescribed treatment, and NMDA modulation warrants clinical oversight in psychiatric illness.

Bottom line

A mechanistically interesting NMDA-enhancing amino acid with real (if small) adjunct evidence in schizophrenia — a clinical adjunct, not a casual nootropic.

Entries that share this one's tags or conditions.

Sources

This entry lists no references of its own.

Last revised . A grade is this entry's reading of the evidence, not medical advice.